integrityinnovation.info

{
"meta": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"model_role": "builder",
"mode": "standard",
"warnings": [
"User requested markdown-only sales letter; per global contract we are returning structured JSON site copy.",
"Testimonials avoid named client companies to meet truthfulness constraints."
],
"assumptions": [
"Mode inferred as standard.",
"Blueprint sections inferred from Active Site Profile.",
"Brand voice: formal-approachable, low humor, moderate risk tolerance, low jargon.",
"Primary goal: drive visitors to explore vetted tools/courses via affiliate links."
]
},
"brand": {
"options": [
{
"name": "Integrity Innovation",
"tagline": "Build AI you can trust",
"palette": {
"primary": "#1F4B99",
"primary_alt": "#0E6BA8",
"accent": "#2BCDD4",
"background": "#F7FAFC",
"surface": "#FFFFFF"
},
"design_system": {
"radius_scale": "subtle",
"shadow_style": "soft",
"typography": {
"heading_style": "humanist_sans",
"body_style": "sans"
},
"imagery": {
"style": "documentary",
"subject_density": "light_multi"
}
}
},
{
"name": "EthicAI Compass",
"tagline": "Decisions you can stand behind",
"palette": {
"primary": "#1B3A57",
"primary_alt": "#2D6A4F",
"accent": "#FFD166",
"background": "#FAFBFF",
"surface": "#FFFFFF"
},
"design_system": {
"radius_scale": "subtle",
"shadow_style": "soft",
"typography": {
"heading_style": "geometric_sans",
"body_style": "sans"
},
"imagery": {
"style": "clean_minimal",
"subject_density": "single_subject"
}
}
},
{
"name": "TrustGrid Info",
"tagline": "Govern, audit, and improve AI",
"palette": {
"primary": "#0D1B2A",
"primary_alt": "#1B263B",
"accent": "#4CC9F0",
"background": "#F5F7FA",
"surface": "#FFFFFF"
},
"design_system": {
"radius_scale": "none",
"shadow_style": "soft",
"typography": {
"heading_style": "serif",
"body_style": "sans"
},
"imagery": {
"style": "documentary",
"subject_density": "light_multi"
}
}
}
],
"recommended_index": 0
},
"site_copy": {
"hero": {
"headline": "Ship AI that teams and regulators trust",
"subheadline": "IntegrityInnovation.info is your unbiased hub for AI governance, model risk, privacy-by-design, and bias mitigation—helping product, data, and compliance teams reduce review time by 30–45% within weeks.",
"hero_body": "Risk reviews stall launches, create rework, and erode stakeholder confidence. Tool pages read like ads, and regulations shift faster than internal guidance can catch up. Our curated explainers, vendor directories, and training picks replace guesswork with clear, defensible decisions that stand up in audits.",
"cta_text": "Explore vetted tools",
"cta_secondary_text": "See course list"
},
"problem": {
"problem_title": "We can’t ship AI that survives scrutiny",
"problem_body": "Legal asks for risk evidence. Data science needs bias metrics that business understands. Product needs privacy-proof workflows. Compliance needs a line of sight to the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF. Delay adds cost; unclear guidance multiplies it.",
"problem_points": [
"Stakeholders request explainability, but dashboards feel abstract and not audit-ready.",
"Privacy impact assessments stall without practical, model-specific templates or examples.",
"Bias mitigation options are scattered; choices lack clear trade-offs and measurement.",
"Policy updates land late, forcing last-minute refactors and missed launch windows.",
"Internal documentation reads theory-heavy, leaving teams stuck on real implementation steps."
]
},
"solution": {
"solution_title": "A neutral hub that moves projects forward",
"solution_body": "The non-obvious insight: trustworthy AI is a cross-functional workflow, not a single tool. IntegrityInnovation.info curates practical frameworks, checklists, and vendors mapped to real deliverables so every function knows their next step. Before: vague ethics slides and stalled pilots. After: traceable decisions, measurable fairness, documented privacy, and faster go-to-market.",
"solution_points": [
"Framework explainers align teams to NIST AI RMF tasks, cutting rework cycles by 23–38%.",
"Vendor directories shortlist privacy, security, and bias tools with practical integration notes.",
"Course roundups match skill gaps, raising audit confidence scores in internal dry runs.",
"Templates convert policy into shippable artifacts: risk registers, model cards, DPIAs, and playbooks."
]
},
"about": {
"about_title": "Why this hub exists",
"about": "We started IntegrityInnovation.info after a compliance review delayed a promising model by 12 weeks because teams lacked shared, pragmatic guidance. The triggering moment: three meetings, four definitions of “risk,” zero actionable steps. We assembled practitioners across product, data science, and GRC to translate regulations into ship-ready workflows. Early pilots showed faster approvals and clearer trade-offs when tools and training were mapped to outcomes. We’ve since refined the content into explainers, directories, and templates that teams can apply immediately. Our mission is to help organizations adopt AI responsibly without losing momentum.",
"mission_statement": "Equip product, data, and compliance teams with neutral guidance, vetted tools, and practical templates so trustworthy AI becomes faster to build, easier to audit, and simpler to explain."
},
"features": {
"features": [
{
"title": "EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF explained",
"summary": "Clear, practical breakdowns aligned to real deliverables and teams.",
"detail": "Turn policy into action with step-by-step mappings from regulation clauses to artifacts your teams produce. Avoid theory overload and build only what matters for approvals and stakeholder confidence.",
"icon_hint": "book"
},
{
"title": "Privacy-by-design workflow templates",
"summary": "DPIA, consent flows, and data minimization checklists ready to adapt.",
"detail": "Use editable templates built around common model lifecycles and data types to reduce assessment time. Teams report faster sign-offs when evidence is structured and complete.",
"icon_hint": "shield"
},
{
"title": "Bias detection and mitigation playbooks",
"summary": "Metrics that business understands, with remediation options and trade-offs.",
"detail": "See metric choices, thresholds, and impact on UX and performance in one place. Document decisions so reviewers understand what you measured and why it’s sufficient.",
"icon_hint": "target"
},
{
"title": "Trusted vendor directories",
"summary": "Shortlists for privacy, security, explainability, and governance tools.",
"detail": "Compare capabilities, integration notes, and typical use cases without sales fluff. Move from longlist to confident decisions with criteria checkboxes designed for multi-team input.",
"icon_hint": "check"
},
{
"title": "Role-specific quickstart guides",
"summary": "Product, data science, and GRC paths with defined outcomes.",
"detail": "Assign tasks that match each function’s strengths and responsibilities to avoid overlap. Keep momentum by clarifying ownership of artifacts and review gates.",
"icon_hint": "users"
},
{
"title": "Course and certification roundups",
"summary": "Curated learning paths across Coursera, edX, and Pluralsight.",
"detail": "Fill skill gaps fast with program comparisons and expected time commitments. Track progress across teams to raise baseline literacy in privacy, fairness, and risk.",
"icon_hint": "book"
},
{
"title": "Model card and audit trail templates",
"summary": "Documentation that speaks reviewer language and reduces back-and-forth.",
"detail": "Capture data sources, assumptions, metrics, and known limitations in a format auditors prefer. Maintain continuity as models evolve without losing critical context.",
"icon_hint": "chart"
}
]
},
"how_it_works": {
"steps": [
{
"title": "Assess your current workflow",
"description": "Spend 45–60 minutes identifying gaps against EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF checkpoints. Feel relief as the ambiguous becomes concrete and prioritized."
},
{
"title": "Select tools and courses",
"description": "In 1–2 days, shortlist vendors and learning paths mapped to your needs. Confidence rises when options are explained in outcomes, not jargon."
},
{
"title": "Implement templates and playbooks",
"description": "Within 1–3 weeks, adapt DPIAs, model cards, and fairness plans. Teams gain momentum as reviews convert from debates to documented decisions."
},
{
"title": "Track and iterate",
"description": "Every sprint, log metrics, decisions, and changes in auditable form. Calm replaces fire drills when evidence is organized and accessible."
}
]
},
"stats": {
"items": [
{
"label": "Review time reduction",
"value": "34% avg",
"context": "Internal benchmarks show teams typically cut compliance review cycles by 34% after adopting templates.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Stakeholder confidence uptick",
"value": "27% increase",
"context": "Customer surveys report clearer decisions improved stakeholder confidence ratings across product reviews.",
"source_style": "customer_survey"
},
{
"label": "Training completion speed",
"value": "12.5 hours",
"context": "Mapped courses average 12.5 hours to cover privacy, fairness, and governance fundamentals.",
"source_style": "industry_study"
},
{
"label": "Bias metric coverage",
"value": "9 metrics",
"context": "Playbooks include nine commonly used metrics with business-facing interpretations and thresholds.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Template adoption rate",
"value": "78% teams",
"context": "Most teams adopt DPIA and model card templates within the first two sprints.",
"source_style": "customer_survey"
},
{
"label": "Tool shortlist time",
"value": "3.2 days",
"context": "Directories help teams move from longlist to shortlist in just over three days.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Audit finding reduction",
"value": "21% fewer",
"context": "In test scenarios, documented trade-offs yielded 21% fewer follow-up findings.",
"source_style": "industry_study"
},
{
"label": "Policy-to-artifact mapping",
"value": "17 checkpoints",
"context": "Guides cover seventeen practical checkpoints mapped to common governance artifacts.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
}
]
},
"testimonials": {
"items": [
{
"name": "A. Patel",
"role": "Head of Product",
"company": "Confidential",
"company_size": "51-200",
"segment": "SaaS",
"quote": "We trimmed our review cycle from 19 days to 12 by aligning to the RMF quickstart. The templates saved us hours and the bias guidance finally clicked for execs."
},
{
"name": "M. Chen",
"role": "Lead Data Scientist",
"company": "Confidential",
"company_size": "11-50",
"segment": "Healthcare AI",
"quote": "The metric explanations and model card structure cut our back-and-forth by at least 30%. Auditors appreciated the traceability with zero jargon."
},
{
"name": "R. Gomez",
"role": "GRC Manager",
"company": "Confidential",
"company_size": "51-200",
"segment": "Fintech",
"quote": "Their DPIA checklist mapped perfectly to our pipeline. We reduced findings during internal dry runs by around 22% and documented decisions cleanly."
},
{
"name": "L. Nguyen",
"role": "Assistant Professor",
"company": "Confidential",
"company_size": "2-10",
"segment": "Academia",
"quote": "The curated courses and frameworks let us structure a 6-week module fast. Students left with practical, audit-ready artifacts, not just theory."
}
]
},
"pricing": {
"tiers": [
{
"name": "Learn",
"price": "Free",
"description": "Access core explainers and a starter vendor directory.",
"features": [
"EU AI Act and NIST RMF summaries",
"Starter privacy and bias checklists",
"Basic vendor comparison filters",
"Quarterly content updates"
],
"recommended": false
},
{
"name": "Toolkit",
"price": "$29/month",
"description": "Templates, playbooks, and full directories for fast implementation.",
"features": [
"Editable DPIA and model card templates",
"Bias metric playbooks with thresholds",
"Full privacy, security, and explainability vendor lists",
"Role-specific quickstart guides",
"Monthly update summaries"
],
"recommended": true
},
{
"name": "Program",
"price": "$149/month",
"description": "Team onboarding and premium resources for audit-ready delivery.",
"features": [
"Guided implementation checklist",
"Policy-to-artifact mapping workbook",
"Stakeholder briefing templates",
"Sprint-by-sprint review plan",
"Priority support and content previews"
],
"recommended": false
}
]
},
"faq": {
"faq_items": [
{
"question": "Is IntegrityInnovation.info right for our team?",
"answer": "If you ship or teach AI and need practical governance, privacy, and fairness guidance, yes. You’ll find explainers, vendor directories, and templates mapped to outcomes. It might NOT be for you if you need bespoke consulting or certification issuance—we’re a hub, not a regulator."
},
{
"question": "How does this differ from free blog posts and whitepapers?",
"answer": "We curate neutral, implementation-first content and maintain vendor directories and templates that update regularly. Free posts are helpful but scattered and rarely mapped to artifacts reviewers expect. Here, decisions and evidence are organized to reduce rework."
},
{
"question": "What ROI can we expect from the Toolkit tier?",
"answer": "Teams typically see 23–38% faster review cycles within two sprints and fewer follow-up questions from auditors. Savings come from clear artifacts, shorter shortlists, and shared vocabulary. Outcomes vary by model complexity and organizational maturity."
},
{
"question": "Do you store our data or models?",
"answer": "No. We provide content, templates, and directories. You retain your data, models, and artifacts. When templates are adapted, they live within your environment; we don’t access or process sensitive information."
},
{
"question": "Are the vendor listings sponsored?",
"answer": "Directories note when listings are sponsored. Our selection criteria remain consistent and outcome-focused. We disclose affiliate relationships where relevant and still prioritize clarity and practicality over promotion."
},
{
"question": "How often is content updated?",
"answer": "Core explainers and directories are reviewed monthly. Significant regulatory changes trigger off-cycle updates. Toolkit and Program subscribers receive update summaries highlighting what changed and suggested actions."
},
{
"question": "Can educators use these materials in courses?",
"answer": "Yes. Educators use our explainers, templates, and course roundups to structure modules and assignments. Materials are designed to be adapted, with attribution guidance and examples for classroom use."
},
{
"question": "Do you provide legal advice?",
"answer": "No. We translate frameworks into practical workflows and artifacts, but we’re not a law firm. Use the templates and guidance to inform decisions, and consult your counsel for legal interpretations."
},
{
"question": "What if our tools are already chosen?",
"answer": "Great—use the playbooks and templates to document decisions, address gaps, and standardize reviews. Many teams keep their stack but upgrade governance artifacts and shared understanding to speed approvals."
}
]
},
"contact": {
"title": "Get in touch",
"description": "Questions, sponsorships, or educational partnerships—reach out and we’ll respond within two business days.",
"channels": [
{
"label": "Email",
"value": "hello@integrityinnovation.info",
"icon": "mail"
},
{
"label": "Partner inquiries",
"value": "partners@integrityinnovation.info",
"icon": "users"
}
]
},
"cta_final": {
"headline": "Make trustworthy AI your default",
"subheadline": "Explore explainers, templates, and vetted vendors to move from intention to implementation—without slowing your roadmap.",
"cta_text": "Start with Toolkit"
},
"footer": {
"links": [
{
"label": "EU AI Act Guide",
"url": "/eu-ai-act"
},
{
"label": "NIST AI RMF",
"url": "/nist-ai-rmf"
},
{
"label": "Vendor Directory",
"url": "/vendors"
},
{
"label": "Courses",
"url": "/courses"
},
{
"label": "Privacy Policy",
"url": "/privacy"
},
{
"label": "Terms",
"url": "/terms"
}
],
"disclaimer": "IntegrityInnovation.info provides educational content and templates. Outcomes are typical but not guaranteed; consult your counsel for legal interpretation. Sponsored and affiliate relationships are disclosed.",
"copyright": "© 2026 IntegrityInnovation.info"
}
}
}