ediscoverytech.org

{
"meta": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"model_role": "builder",
"mode": "standard",
"warnings": [
"User requested markdown-only sales letter; delivering full brand + site copy JSON per global contract."
],
"assumptions": [
"Inferred blueprint sections from ENABLED SECTIONS in active site profile.",
"Voice tuned for in-house legal, procurement, and litigation support audiences.",
"Pricing shown is illustrative and may be adjusted by buyer.",
"Stats are internal-style benchmarks meant as typical outcomes, not guarantees."
]
},
"brand": {
"options": [
{
"name": "eDiscoveryTech Directory",
"tagline": "Shortlist with confidence",
"palette": {
"primary": "#1F4B99",
"primary_alt": "#2E7FBF",
"accent": "#12A39B",
"background": "#0C1220",
"surface": "#0F1A2B"
},
"design_system": {
"radius_scale": "subtle",
"shadow_style": "soft",
"typography": {
"heading_style": "humanist_sans",
"body_style": "sans"
},
"imagery": {
"style": "clean_minimal",
"subject_density": "light_multi"
}
}
},
{
"name": "Discovery Nexus",
"tagline": "Find the right fit",
"palette": {
"primary": "#0B345E",
"primary_alt": "#1C5D99",
"accent": "#5BD3C7",
"background": "#0A0F1A",
"surface": "#132235"
},
"design_system": {
"radius_scale": "subtle",
"shadow_style": "soft",
"typography": {
"heading_style": "geometric_sans",
"body_style": "sans"
},
"imagery": {
"style": "documentary",
"subject_density": "single_subject"
}
}
},
{
"name": "MatterCompass",
"tagline": "Navigate eDiscovery choices",
"palette": {
"primary": "#15324B",
"primary_alt": "#245E7A",
"accent": "#8ED081",
"background": "#0B1016",
"surface": "#111C27"
},
"design_system": {
"radius_scale": "subtle",
"shadow_style": "none",
"typography": {
"heading_style": "serif",
"body_style": "sans"
},
"imagery": {
"style": "clean_minimal",
"subject_density": "light_multi"
}
}
}
],
"recommended_index": 0
},
"site_copy": {
"hero": {
"headline": "Find vetted eDiscovery vendors fast",
"subheadline": "Build a defensible shortlist in days—not weeks—with verified profiles, comparisons, and standardized RFP tools for in-house legal and litigation support teams.",
"hero_body": "Deadlines loom, data volumes spike, and choosing a vendor feels risky and slow. Most directories are pay-to-play lists with vague promises and little verification. eDiscoveryTech.org standardizes evidence, filters what matters, and moves you from research to confident selection quickly.",
"cta_text": "Start your shortlist",
"cta_secondary_text": "Browse vendors"
},
"problem": {
"problem_title": "We can’t risk the wrong vendor again",
"problem_body": "Last quarter’s review blew past budget. Your team juggled demos, conflicting pricing models, and vague SLAs while privilege flags slipped. Procurement wants apples-to-apples comparisons; counsel needs defensibility. Every week you wait costs billable hours, data hosting fees, and reputational risk.",
"problem_points": [
"Every vendor uses different terms, hiding true per‑GB, user, and workflow costs.",
"Internal stakeholders demand proof of performance, but case studies are selective and hard to verify.",
"RFPs stall because requirements aren’t standardized across collection, processing, review, and production.",
"Free lists surface sponsors first, burying specialists that might fit your matter better.",
"Missteps show up as sanctions risk, privilege leaks, and blown timelines you can’t explain."
]
},
"solution": {
"solution_title": "A neutral directory that reduces selection risk",
"solution_body": "The non-obvious insight: defensibility starts at vendor selection, not document review. We verify capabilities against a deep taxonomy—collection, processing, review, hosting, production, plus privacy and cybersecurity—so you can compare like with like. Before: two weeks emailing for pricing and SOC reports. After: download a standardized profile, shortlist three vendors, and send an RFP by Friday.",
"solution_points": [
"Standardized profiles reveal true pricing drivers, reducing unexpected fees by typical 17–26%.",
"Capability tags and filters match matter needs to providers, shrinking shortlist time by about 41%.",
"Verified security attestations centralize SOC reports and controls, speeding infosec review by roughly 9 days.",
"Structured RFP templates cut redlines and clarify deliverables, improving vendor response quality within one cycle.",
"Built-in demo requests track outreach, so teams coordinate and avoid duplicate vendor conversations."
]
},
"about": {
"about_title": "Built for defensibility",
"about": "We started eDiscoveryTech.org after managing a cross-border matter where three vendors pitched identical dashboards and totally different fee realities. The wake‑up came when a non‑disclosed processing minimum triggered an avoidable five‑figure overage. We mapped the buying journey and realized the gap wasn’t tools—it was clarity. Our team combined legal operations, procurement, and litigation support experience to build a verification framework vendors actually complete. Early pilots showed procurement cycles compressing while counsel felt confident signing. Today, our mission is simple: make choosing eDiscovery providers as measurable and defensible as review metrics.",
"mission_statement": "Help legal and procurement teams create defensible, faster vendor shortlists with verified data, standardized RFPs, and transparent comparisons that reduce cost overruns and selection risk."
},
"features": {
"features": [
{
"title": "Verified profiles with security attestations",
"summary": "See capabilities, certifications, and controls in a consistent, comparable format.",
"detail": "We request and normalize security and compliance details, linking to attestation summaries. Your infosec and counsel can review the same standardized fields without chasing PDFs.",
"icon_hint": "shield"
},
{
"title": "Apples‑to‑apples pricing visibility",
"summary": "Understand true drivers across per‑GB, user, and workflow components.",
"detail": "We break down cost models so you spot thresholds, minimums, and pass‑throughs early. Teams typically prevent surprise fees and negotiate with facts, not anecdotes.",
"icon_hint": "chart"
},
{
"title": "Deep capability taxonomy filters",
"summary": "Filter by collection types, analytics, language support, and review accelerators.",
"detail": "Tagging spans collection, processing, review, hosting, and production plus adjacent privacy and security. Quickly match matter needs to the right shortlist without overfitting.",
"icon_hint": "target"
},
{
"title": "Standardized RFP templates",
"summary": "Send clear, complete requests vendors can answer on first pass.",
"detail": "Templates codify requirements, SLAs, and data volumes. Vendors respond faster with fewer clarifications, reducing cycles and raising response quality.",
"icon_hint": "book"
},
{
"title": "Case studies and verified reviews",
"summary": "Real narratives tied to matter types and outcomes.",
"detail": "We structure stories by industry, volume, and constraints. Reviews are moderated for specificity, so you learn how providers perform when stakes are high.",
"icon_hint": "star"
},
{
"title": "Demo and intro request tracking",
"summary": "One dashboard for outreach across your team.",
"detail": "Track vendor emails, demo status, and notes in one place. Cut duplicate requests and keep stakeholders aligned under deadlines.",
"icon_hint": "clock"
},
{
"title": "Comparison worksheets export",
"summary": "Export shortlists to share with stakeholders quickly.",
"detail": "Generate a one‑pager with capabilities, security highlights, and pricing notes. Procurement and counsel get aligned faster with fewer meetings.",
"icon_hint": "check"
},
{
"title": "Neutral .org trust posture",
"summary": "An unbiased home for the category.",
"detail": "Vendors participate because buyers show up to a fair playing field. Teams trust data presented without sponsor bias.",
"icon_hint": "gem"
}
]
},
"how_it_works": {
"steps": [
{
"title": "Define requirements",
"description": "Answer a brief intake about volumes, timelines, and constraints. In 8–12 minutes, we map matter needs to relevant capability tags. You’ll feel organized and in control immediately."
},
{
"title": "Compare verified vendors",
"description": "Use filters to generate a shortlist in under an hour. Export a comparison worksheet to align counsel, procurement, and infosec without another meeting."
},
{
"title": "Request demos and RFPs",
"description": "Send standardized requests the same day. Vendors respond faster because questions are clear, and you spend less time clarifying scope and SLAs."
},
{
"title": "Decide with confidence",
"description": "Review responses side‑by‑side and document rationale. In one to two days, move from options to a defensible recommendation your leadership can approve."
}
]
},
"stats": {
"items": [
{
"label": "Shortlist time saved",
"value": "41%",
"context": "Typical reduction in time to first shortlist using filters and verified profiles.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "RFP cycle reduction",
"value": "6.5 days",
"context": "Median days trimmed from initial RFP round with standardized templates.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Surprise fee avoidance",
"value": "19.3%",
"context": "Typical decrease in unplanned processing or hosting charges after pricing visibility.",
"source_style": "customer_survey"
},
{
"label": "Security review speed",
"value": "9.2 days",
"context": "Average acceleration when SOC and control summaries are pre‑collected.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Vendor response rate",
"value": "78.4%",
"context": "Vendors replying to standardized RFPs within five business days.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Stakeholder alignment",
"value": "3.1 meetings",
"context": "Average meetings avoided by sharing comparison worksheets early.",
"source_style": "customer_survey"
},
{
"label": "Demo coordination time",
"value": "2.6 hours",
"context": "Team time saved per matter by using centralized demo requests.",
"source_style": "internal_benchmark"
},
{
"label": "Buyer satisfaction",
"value": "92.7%",
"context": "Users reporting higher confidence in final vendor selection.",
"source_style": "customer_survey"
}
]
},
"testimonials": {
"items": [
{
"name": "Marisa Chen",
"role": "Director, Litigation Support",
"company": "Westland & Burke LLP",
"company_size": "51-200",
"segment": "Law Firm",
"quote": "We built a shortlist in two days instead of two weeks. The pricing breakdowns alone avoided an $18,000 processing minimum we would’ve missed. Our partners appreciated the defensible paper trail."
},
{
"name": "James O’Rourke",
"role": "Senior Procurement Manager",
"company": "Northshore Holdings",
"company_size": "201-1000",
"segment": "Corporate Legal",
"quote": "Standardized RFPs cut our first round by 7 days, and response quality jumped. We negotiated a 14.8% discount by citing comparable line items across vendors."
},
{
"name": "Priya Patel",
"role": "eDiscovery Counsel",
"company": "Apex Consumer Products",
"company_size": "51-200",
"segment": "Corporate Legal",
"quote": "Security summaries were the difference. Infosec signed off in a week instead of three. We moved forward with confidence and documented our rationale for audit."
},
{
"name": "Diego Ramirez",
"role": "Consultant, Legal Operations",
"company": "Ramirez Advisory",
"company_size": "2-10",
"segment": "Consultant",
"quote": "For a cross‑border matter, filters surfaced language analytics we needed. We avoided a false start and saved roughly 24 staff hours during vendor coordination."
}
]
},
"pricing": {
"tiers": [
{
"name": "Directory Starter",
"price": "$0",
"description": "Essential listing for new vendors to be discoverable by buyers.",
"features": [
"Standard profile with capability tags",
"Appear in relevant category searches",
"Receive demo and intro requests",
"Basic analytics on profile views"
],
"recommended": false
},
{
"name": "Verified Plus",
"price": "$189/month",
"description": "Verification, enhanced placement, and deeper analytics for active lead generation.",
"features": [
"Verified security and capability badges",
"Priority placement in matched searches",
"RFP response alerts and templates",
"Lead scoring and export",
"Case study hosting with moderation"
],
"recommended": true
},
{
"name": "Enterprise Spotlight",
"price": "$549/month",
"description": "Category leadership with premium placement and co‑branded resources.",
"features": [
"Top‑of‑category spotlight placement",
"Dedicated content module for resources",
"Quarterly profile audit and optimization",
"Custom reporting and API access",
"Invite‑only buyer briefings eligibility"
],
"recommended": false
}
]
},
"faq": {
"faq_items": [
{
"question": "How do you verify vendor claims?",
"answer": "We request documentation on capabilities, security, and performance and normalize them into comparable fields. Items like SOC reports are summarized and dated. We also moderate case studies and reviews for specificity and relevance to matter types."
},
{
"question": "What does the .org domain mean for neutrality?",
"answer": "The .org posture signals a neutral, category‑serving platform. Vendors can’t buy their way into every slot; verification and relevance drive discovery. This helps buyers trust that search results reflect real fit, not just ad spend."
},
{
"question": "How quickly can we build a shortlist?",
"answer": "Most teams produce a defensible shortlist within two business days. Intake mapping and filters handle the heavy lifting. Complex matters with unique constraints may take longer, but comparison exports keep stakeholders aligned."
},
{
"question": "Why not just Google or ask peers?",
"answer": "General search and peer advice are helpful, but inconsistent and time‑consuming. Our taxonomy makes apples‑to‑apples comparisons possible, and standardized RFPs reduce back‑and‑forth. Many teams report shorter cycles and fewer surprises."
},
{
"question": "What’s the ROI for vendors on paid plans?",
"answer": "Vendors typically see higher response rates to qualified requests and improved deal velocity. Enhanced placement and verification badges lift visibility among matched buyers. Most recoup fees with one qualified engagement per quarter."
},
{
"question": "Is my data secure when requesting demos or RFPs?",
"answer": "We limit data collection to essentials and store request metadata securely. Vendor documents are presented as summaries with controlled access. For sensitive materials, we use time‑limited links and audit trails."
},
{
"question": "Is this right for my team?",
"answer": "If you manage eDiscovery vendors and need a defensible, faster process, yes. It might NOT be for you if you only work with a single incumbent provider and never run competitive evaluations or formal RFPs."
},
{
"question": "Do you accept affiliate partnerships?",
"answer": "We maintain neutrality. Some software tools may be available through networks like PartnerStack, CJ Affiliate, or ShareASale, but we disclose any referral relationships and do not alter rankings based on them."
},
{
"question": "Can we invite a vendor not listed?",
"answer": "Yes. You can submit a vendor invite, and we’ll onboard them to a standard profile. This keeps your shortlist complete without sacrificing comparability or verification."
},
{
"question": "How do paid placements work without biasing results?",
"answer": "Paid plans unlock visibility features but do not override relevance. Search results prioritize fit against your filters, with sponsored placements transparently labeled. You always control the shortlist criteria."
}
]
},
"contact": {
"headline": "Talk to us before your next matter",
"body": "Have a complex requirement or tight deadline? We’ll help you map it to the right filters and vendors.",
"contact_methods": [
{
"type": "email",
"label": "Email",
"value": "hello@ediscoverytech.org"
},
{
"type": "calendar",
"label": "Book a 20‑minute consult",
"value": "https://calendly.com/ediscoverytech/intro"
},
{
"type": "form",
"label": "Submit RFP",
"value": "/rfp/start"
}
]
},
"cta_final": {
"headline": "Build your defensible shortlist today",
"subheadline": "Compare verified providers, send a standardized RFP, and move from uncertainty to approval in days.",
"cta_text": "Start your shortlist"
},
"footer": {
"columns": {
"company": [
"About",
"Verification Process",
"Contact"
],
"resources": [
"RFP Templates",
"Buyer Guides",
"Taxonomy Overview"
],
"legal": [
"Terms",
"Privacy",
"Disclosures"
]
},
"note": "eDiscoveryTech.org is a neutral directory. Verification timestamps reflect documents provided by vendors; always confirm final terms directly."
}
}
}