while you still have full context of everything we're doing, including everything needed for you to build this new code base from the existing code base, as well as the augmentations and innovations that you and the architect have collectively provided.

I would be interested in a full architect-level document that could theoretically be used to rebuild the entire application from a one shot. To include a full description of all engines, features, components, and things that we have already built in and those that we have planned to build in, so a full reporting. A single document capable of being used as a seed document that would answer at least 90% of the questions needed to rebuild this from a one shot for a capable AI LLM. I asked you this and bring this up now and ask that you engage the architect with full context as well, and how they would recommend structuring that for such a purpose. Specifically, this is really important. The architect must have full context of not only the code and the application, but the purpose and all of the nuanced reasons why we made the choices and are heading in the directions that we are. We already have specifically MCP focus and the UI choices and development choices that we've made all throughout this process. In effect, this would be a full project end-to-end documentation:
- what it is
- why it is
- what it solves
- what it's capable of
- its features
- its functions
- the reasons behind them
- why the way we're doing them
- we made the choices
- why they're optimal at least at this stage, pending continued analysis
Why the software is laid out the way that it is, and why we are displaying metadata, for instance, for all the things we do:
- what things are important
- making sure everything is uniquely identifiable and labelable
- flexibility
- portability
- the MCP requirements
- why we're building a second system alongside rather than rip and replace
- the philosophy behind storage and how cheap it is
- how it's much better to make copies of or create fresh than be modifying, since storage isn't very cheap, etc.
Should be very comprehensive. I just want to make sure we're on the same page there. Again, I'm asking you this now at this point because everything is fully in context and you're just completing these very significant tasks that require a full understanding and encapsulation of this entire application and its purpose.
All of the setup files, if not review whatever you need to make sure the architect is fully aware of all the documents that include this:
- my prompts
- our discussions
- everything mentioned
Got it. That would be epic and would perfectly set us up moving forward to the next phase.